Full-time Prayer

In recent posts, I have been writing about my journey through different stages of prayer. When I first started to pray, I treated God like a divine Santa. My prayers never went beyond asking God for things. Then I learned to expand my prayer to include other elements, like honoring God, confessing, giving thanks, and of course asking for things. Then I learned to treat prayer as a two-way conversation. I learned to devote time to listen to God. My journey took me through Santa prayers to formal prayers and then conversational prayers.

Conversational prayer is wonderful, but there is one more stop on the journey or prayer. I call it full-time prayer. Some time after college, I began to realize that my standard approach to prayer was to pray when I wanted. If my prayers were like a telephone call, it was the bat-phone. It only rang one way. But what if the prayer phone rings both ways?

Full-time prayer can happen in the order Walter Wangerin Jr. describes: we speak, God listens, God speaks, we listen. But it can also be reordered. Full-time prayer can also be ordered like this: God speaks, we listen, we speak, God listens. Full-time prayer is constant. It is how someone who has stopped practicing discipleship and started being a disciple prays.

This is the kind of prayer Paul writes about in 1 Thessalonians 5:17 when he instructs the Thessalonians to “pray without ceasing.” We are not the only ones who can initiate a prayer conversation. But if we are going to engage in full-time prayer, we need to be attentive. We need to be constantly in the presence of God in order to hear his invitation into conversation.

This is what Brother Lawrence meant when he spoke about practicing the presence of God and why he says our time in the real world feeds our set aside times of prayer and not the other way around.

Conversational Prayers

Last week, I wrote about the first two approaches I took to prayer. I’m not sure it works this way with everyone, but for me, these approaches were stages along my journey, each a little more mature than the last. I call the third approach conversational prayer. After graduating from Santa prayers to formal prayers, I grew to understand the importance of listening in prayer. I realized prayer, like any conversation, goes go both ways. I learned to pray and do my best to listen for God’s response.

I first experienced this kind of prayer when I was in junior high. My dad was encouraging me to move in with him (my parents were divorced and I lived with my mother). He told me to go home and pray about the decision. He told me to listen, to expect God to answer my prayer. I didn’t know what to expect, but I trusted my dad. I went home. I prayed. I listened. And God answered. I didn’t hear an audible voice, but the words “It’s going to be all right” started rattling around in my head.

The circumstance leading to my dad’s request to move in with him was my tendency to not follow through on things. He saw a pattern in my life that he recognized in his own and he believed living with him would have a positive impact on me. The words “It’s going to be all right” felt like God telling me to stay with my mother. This is the first time I remember hearing directly from God.

I wish I had started to listen to God from that day forward, but I didn’t. It wasn’t until college when I read more and started to practice this approach regularly. It was in this season that I began the practice of Enoch walks. I would walk and speak to God as if he was walking beside me. I spoke. I asked questions, and I waited for God to respond. And he did! More often than not, I was able to hear God’s answer. Like his answer to my question about where I should live, it was never an audible voice, but a thought that rattled around in my head.

It has been difficult at times to discern if the thought is my own or God’s, but over time it has become more clear. It’s not easy, and I still put the thoughts up to the scrutiny of Scripture. But I have come to the point where more often than not it is obvious when the thoughts are mine and when the thoughts are God’s.

History Channel’s The Bible and the weak heroes of our faith

Taking a story from one medium to another usually requires changes. You just can’t translate a book word for word to the screen. It won’t work. Which is why I have always been skeptical of television shows and films adapting stories from Scripture. In fact, most of us are. Not even a comic book geek gets as upset over a minor story change as we do when someone tweaks a detail of Scripture on the big or little screen.

the-bible-history-channelTake for example the opening scene of The History Channel mini-series, The Bible. It begins with a shot of the ark being tossed by the stormy waves of the great flood. We see the inhabitants of the boat, animals and humans alike, spooked and huddled together. Then, a voice cuts through the sounds of the storm, “In the beginning, God created the heavens and the earth.” Noah tells the story of creation.

I have heard numerous people complain, “Noah didn’t write Genesis!” But a creative decision was made to demonstrate the faith of Noah. While his family fears for their lives, he reminds them of the greatness and the power of God. Is it a departure from what tradition tells us about the authorship of Genesis? Sure. But did I like it? You bet I did.

There is a lot to like about the mini-series. People are becoming more familiar with Scripture. The production is generally good, and I have heard more people talking about Scripture in and out of church than usual.

Of course, the series had to trim quite a bit. Stories have been omitted to fit all of Scripture into ten hours of programming. I understand the reasons, but I have been frustrated a bit with some moments that didn’t make the cut. We did not see Abraham doubting God’s ability to protect him and telling Pharaoh Sarah was his sister (Genesis 12:10-20). Moses didn’t question God’s call once, much less three times(Exodus 3:11, Exodus 4:1 and Exodus 4:10), and he certainly didn’t ask God to send someone else (Exodus 4:13)! Aaron didn’t build a golden calf for the Israelites (32:1-16). And these are just a few.

I am bothered by these omissions because they are the messy parts of the story. It concerns me that the mini-series is portraying our heroes of faith as a group of people who never fell, never doubted God. My wife said it best when she told me, “I like Thomas. I like that Peter looked away from Jesus and started to sink. It helps me be okay with my own doubts.”

She is right. There is comfort in the knowledge that the father of the nation of Israel doubted God’s promise multiple times. I love that God chose to use a guy like Sampson who loved the ladies a little too much.

Noah was a drunk.

Jacob was a thief.

Joseph was a cocky jerk.

Moses had anger issues.

Joshua was afraid.

David and Solomon struggled with lust.

Peter denied Jesus.

Thomas doubted.

It helps me to know I am not alone. If I am honest, I have to admit I doubt God sometimes. There are times I question his goodness or his strength. There are times I wonder if he cares.  And knowing that God continued to love and use the people in Scripture who fell and doubted him helps me to lean into him in times like these.

Page 5 of 52« First...«34567»102030...Last »
Proudly using Dynamic Headers by Nicasio WordPress Design